Red Lines and Towing the Line(on Syria).
The President is not putting America's credibility at stake, he is staking out the credibility of International Law and Globalization. This is a far cry from the Bush Era "war" president and unifier.**
Pre-title or heading: Rogers' Soap Box, might read "Pit Lip Schtick ".
Related: The Vatican, Steve Clemons, Steve Benen, Maddow Blog, [Boehner let her.]
8-30-13
From Thomas* Roberts, on Crisis in Syria: Re-Bolt On / Bring Em On [!]
(scroll click) Bay of Pit Bulls or Bay of Lip Schtick?
Wiping the Floors @ the UN[!]
* Italics reminder re:(un-bolds too)
** ibid[!]
(FP!)
(b.s.) read Make it
so.
Bolt On: A. Toning
Down the Lines. , B. Waiting
for [Calm Cast] , C., D. Trick
Question of the Day? , E.
Bring
Em On: a., b., c., {}D. Congress-
- to boldly go... , E. Everything
is on the Table! {Why not Hagel?}
{Will Obama declare the end of a war?/ Fix of war powers?}
*** (b.s.)
[(NOW) SOS Kerry]{..."standing on ceremony"}, }by Ghosh{, ^ un-telegraph/playbook
Clear segue: Secretary of State Kerry begins w/ my running notation
["read", un-Rumsfeld "know", smoking "social media", ^ }pinnacle of our perdicament{, "risk"/"do nothing","matters"..."know what we know", "respect" ... }general body/China-Russia-Arab signators/jury{ "ultimately".] close. [SOS]
Note: Quotation "marks" =Kerry comments, ^ marks= tangent to NOW, }{ = marks/highlites my comment/{urgency of now} AM "telegraphing"
[Juxta Position? ... AM numbers?/Clemons/Congressional Bane or?(letter) }I cannot say there should not be a debate, or a vote, or that it won't matter, but it is very important how the resolution is worded and if we can imagine congress krafting it?]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Tangent Bane or. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Tangent Bane or. Sort by date Show all posts
Thursday, August 29, 2013
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Thursday, January 06, 2011
Follow-up
And post insert.[Update]
Old Digs: Slate on Health Reform
Case Study:
If his crime is so clear he should be prosecuted, but that is part of the problem. Part of the constitution involves treaties being the law of the land. I did not get into the particulars of his charges but his treatment is possibly a violation as well. If his intent or principle was to be a whistle blower for international crimes, he should have been more select, not that he would not have to face justice just the same. The likely reason he can't face justice is our country can't face justice. So I am saying that even if he thought he had principles he should not have done what he did. And even if he does, he must face trial, but then there is the difficulty of exposing more by allowing him a defense and having to defend the country. So I do not willy nilly and neither do the PsySR expect that there not be standard treatment for traitors,(which it seems has been gone beyond) but if this is it, then that is another exposure and point of my so called Case Study...Justice and American Exceptionalism.
A calling of Blues and Jazz?
Under the QCON this is a ramble of sorts and news. There is a common thread in the contact of the tangent being others only lightly referenced or embedded.
P.S. A particular charge(PC?) that one side makes is that the otherside has not read bills. I posit two concerns. Have they read the bill? Of course it is valid that they do not have the time sometimes. But why not at least mention what they have issue with. This of course this is especially related to the second link in this post. I will not be reading all of these things, but we can sometimes let others be our filters.
[BREAKING: Not to Lampoon*, but up on READING?]
*no pun intended but this just in my INBOX and upon reading makes it back to the P.S.[and just prior...an update]
[There is more than a Ribble run through this, and it is not just Dialogue or Dialectic, nor wordplay intended, but it seams** American Exceptionalism.]
** see Labels
[In a less uniting manner Thom Hartmann comes through again, not that there is anything wrong. But he does correct a name and give some party history.***]
*** Thom has altered his course in regard to pronouncing Boehner's name despite the principle it was founded on, Bane or Democratic Republic. It is interesting that Jefferson and Lincoln are involved in the history of party name changes. BTW: would it be too far fetched to call the No Labels Party, the Platonic Party? It is not really a party, but then it might be the latest niche in the evolution. I came to this in a reflective(read bounce) way. Would it be right to call them The Republic Party?
Old Digs: Slate on Health Reform
Case Study:
If his crime is so clear he should be prosecuted, but that is part of the problem. Part of the constitution involves treaties being the law of the land. I did not get into the particulars of his charges but his treatment is possibly a violation as well. If his intent or principle was to be a whistle blower for international crimes, he should have been more select, not that he would not have to face justice just the same. The likely reason he can't face justice is our country can't face justice. So I am saying that even if he thought he had principles he should not have done what he did. And even if he does, he must face trial, but then there is the difficulty of exposing more by allowing him a defense and having to defend the country. So I do not willy nilly and neither do the PsySR expect that there not be standard treatment for traitors,(which it seems has been gone beyond) but if this is it, then that is another exposure and point of my so called Case Study...Justice and American Exceptionalism.
A calling of Blues and Jazz?
Under the QCON this is a ramble of sorts and news. There is a common thread in the contact of the tangent being others only lightly referenced or embedded.
P.S. A particular charge(PC?) that one side makes is that the otherside has not read bills. I posit two concerns. Have they read the bill? Of course it is valid that they do not have the time sometimes. But why not at least mention what they have issue with. This of course this is especially related to the second link in this post. I will not be reading all of these things, but we can sometimes let others be our filters.
[BREAKING: Not to Lampoon*, but up on READING?]
*no pun intended but this just in my INBOX and upon reading makes it back to the P.S.[and just prior...an update]
[There is more than a Ribble run through this, and it is not just Dialogue or Dialectic, nor wordplay intended, but it seams** American Exceptionalism.]
** see Labels
[In a less uniting manner Thom Hartmann comes through again, not that there is anything wrong. But he does correct a name and give some party history.***]
*** Thom has altered his course in regard to pronouncing Boehner's name despite the principle it was founded on, Bane or Democratic Republic. It is interesting that Jefferson and Lincoln are involved in the history of party name changes. BTW: would it be too far fetched to call the No Labels Party, the Platonic Party? It is not really a party, but then it might be the latest niche in the evolution. I came to this in a reflective(read bounce) way. Would it be right to call them The Republic Party?
Friday, February 13, 2015
Bane or Book
Many Republican candidates have book deals in this race.
Here Boehner shows his true colors and we can throw the book at him.
He is known for his tan or orange tint, while No Labels or Bridge candidates range purple.
But on The Ed Show this afternoon we can throw the purple at him.
Batter bather that's anarchist folks[!]
[tangent]
(Rubio, MM)
Here Boehner shows his true colors and we can throw the book at him.
He is known for his tan or orange tint, while No Labels or Bridge candidates range purple.
But on The Ed Show this afternoon we can throw the purple at him.
Batter bather that's anarchist folks[!]
[tangent]
(Rubio, MM)
Thursday, August 04, 2011
Happy Birthday President Obama!
Best Wishes!
Is this a present from Alan Simpson?
Super Committee in balance.
[update to 8-1-11 original -
Final Notes: Hall and Bashir 2B updated (alter or Bane).]
Hall TDR
Bashir
2B
[update to 8-3-11 original -
8-3-11 Obama/Simpson/Bowles follow-up: and interesting Tangent. NFRY files or fries.]
Not Yet. Or Dylan but Alter or Altar*.
See the Graphic Launch.
Putting America Back to Work.
*Cillizza
Fineman/Walsh
Finney/Heye
[Rhodes/O'Donnell and real lures.]
[And a suggested birthday present from leaders Pelosi and Reid, their nomination of strong leaders for the super committee.]
Is this a present from Alan Simpson?
Super Committee in balance.
[update to 8-1-11 original -
Final Notes: Hall and Bashir 2B updated (alter or Bane).]
Hall TDR
Bashir
2B
[update to 8-3-11 original -
8-3-11 Obama/Simpson/Bowles follow-up: and interesting Tangent. NFRY files or fries.]
Not Yet. Or Dylan but Alter or Altar*.
See the Graphic Launch.
Putting America Back to Work.
*Cillizza
Fineman/Walsh
Finney/Heye
[Rhodes/O'Donnell and real lures.]
[And a suggested birthday present from leaders Pelosi and Reid, their nomination of strong leaders for the super committee.]
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Updates
[under construction]
Not Fully Read Yet
[Slipping this behind previous post.]
Inter-related updates to be added.
Belated Breaking News (Blair/Rose/Gingrich)
Bane(or) Change(D'Souza Chant)
Three Clauses for (Freud)
Let Me Finish (Hardball Panel)
I'm not even (image one)
Still haven't (B partied)
Updates(this post)(see Stockman)
Off the Charts[9-17-10: Tangent-Ribble-Insert/Stay the Comity/Under the Radar]
[footnote: see first link above @31m 40s] top5%earners=top40%spending but we are talking only top 1%, nobody @NBC corrected the CNBC reporter, despite making good points. ("curious about studies" "moody's" and stocks.)]
Not Fully Read Yet
[Slipping this behind previous post.]
Inter-related updates to be added.
Belated Breaking News (Blair/Rose/Gingrich)
Bane(or) Change(D'Souza Chant)
Three Clauses for (Freud)
Let Me Finish (Hardball Panel)
I'm not even (image one)
Still haven't (B partied)
Updates(this post)(see Stockman)
Off the Charts[9-17-10: Tangent-Ribble-Insert/Stay the Comity/Under the Radar]
[footnote: see first link above @31m 40s] top5%earners=top40%spending but we are talking only top 1%, nobody @NBC corrected the CNBC reporter, despite making good points. ("curious about studies" "moody's" and stocks.)]
Monday, March 23, 2015
Obama With Drama
For complete context I will have to read further.
For preemptive context^, is it between the Frost and the Peck?
Recent references?^^Poetic linkage?
(^) F P
(^^) R. Throwing the Game / r. Net and Yahoo? , WWW Wisconsin Lesson?
 |
| The WhoSure State? |
* looking deeper into the quagmire
Re:4th mat ?
[Meanwhile, still digging. Where did I bury that poetic link? It may have only been under the italics 2 back.]
AnyHow ... apparently I buried or wove under the nexus** of a brighter side of life. I must return later to the [...] *** junction?
** bane oar tangent
*** 3-24-15 kantinued post red[!]
Translation: did read.
Path/Road~Frost/Peck to be sorted under Fed oration[!]
Vulcan/English~Table/Borg \~\
Spock/Nimoy~Idle/Palin Galactic Conference?
Let alone . . . ??[!]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)